IJMSRT foster a global community of researchers and provide them with a platform to publish and access high-quality scientific content. We strive to be at the forefront of scientific communication, enabling the rapid dissemination of cutting-edge research and driving advancements in various fields.
Read moreThe context: The pandemic has driven an unprecedented and swift transition to remote and hybrid work, changing the way organizations are operating in relation to productivity, communication, employee well-being, culture, and career development. This study explores employee perceptions of the work from-home (WFH) and hybrid work models within five conceptual dimensions of the work environment and productivity, communication and collaboration, work-life balance and well-being, organizational culture and inclusion and career development and how these dimensions relate to overall employee satisfaction. Participants: 105 employees were identified in both hybrid and fully on-site and flexible work arrangements. Design, Development, Results: A semi-structured questionnaire consisting of 25 five-point Likert scale questions along with a few categorical demographic questions and open-ended questions for qualitative responses was administered. Discussion: The results suggested that employees working under hybrid or fully on-site work arrangements were more supportive of the current work arrangements than their flexible counterparts. Conclusion: The findings highlight that employees in hybrid or fully on-site work arrangements are more supportive of current work arrangements than those in flexible arrangements. The quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive, reliability estimation, Pearson correlation, multiple linear regression, independent-samples t tests, one-way ANOVA, and chi-square tests of association. Qualitative answers related to perceived benefits, barriers and recommendations were analyzed thematically through frequency-based content analysis. Findings: The respondents' mean scores were uniformly high across five constructs: productivity, communication, well-being, culture and career development, with 94.3% saying that they were "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" with the arrangement they are in. Type of work arrangement was significantly related to satisfaction (χ² = 10.66, p = .031), with hybrid workers the most satisfied with their arrangement. Prospects for career development were significantly different by frequency of working from home (F = 2.89, p = .039), with occasional WFH Employees are having comparatively low career-development scores compared to full-time at home and full-time at work participants. Flexibility, supportive teams, and the decrease in commuter time were the most common benefits, whereas isolation, technical challenges, and problems with communication were the most common challenges, and communication and better recognition programs were the most requested organizational solutions. Extending the findings of the study, the author synthesizes his findings with two complementary literatures to support the managerial implications that HR functions need to view hybrid-work design as a problem of service quality/HR a metric rather than logistical issue. It builds on previous human-capital-market studies on service recovery and quality of hire and HR metrics in the pre-pandemic environment, and recommends an agenda for future research based on gaps.
References
Anakpo, G., Nqwayibana, Z., & Mishi, S. (2023). The impact of work-from-home on employee performance and productivity: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(5), 4529. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054529
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju032
Choudhury, P., Khanna, T., Makridis, C. A., & Schirmann, K. (2024). Is hybrid work the best of both worlds? Evidence from a field experiment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01428
Emanuel, N., & Harrington, E. (2024). Working remotely? Selection, treatment, and the market for remote work. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 16(4), 528–559. Emanuel, N., Harrington, E., & Pallais, A. (2026). Home alone: Remote work, isolation, and mental health. Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aec7671
Gibbs, M., Mengel, F., & Siemroth, C. (2023). Work from home and productivity: Evidence from personnel and analytics data on information technology professionals. Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, 1(1), 7–41. https://doi.org/10.1086/721803
Gupta, A. (2018). Impact of pre hire orientation on quality of campus placement: A study on BPS/BPO industry's service quality perspectives. Kindler: The Journal of Army Institute of Management, Kolkata, 1, 250–258. Gupta, A. (2021). Service recovery strategies for the service providers in human capital market. The Journal of Oriental Research Madras, 22–35.
Gupta, A., & Baksi, A. K. (2018). Impact of technology on recruitment process and its impact on service quality of HR service providers. BIMS Journal of Management.
Gupta, A., & Baksi, A. K. (2020). A comparative study of the perception of clients and service providers in the areas of service recovery in human capital market. Jaipuria International Journal of Management Research.
Gupta, A., & Baksi, A. K. (2022). HR metrics and quality of hire in human capital market: A case study. Specialusis Ugdymas, 2(43), 1872–1883.
Hackney, A., Yung, M., Somasundram, K. G., Nowrouzi-Kia, B., Oakman, J., & Yazdani, A. (2022). Working in the digital economy: A systematic review of the impact of work from home arrangements on personal and organizational performance and productivity. PLOS ONE, 17(10), e0274728. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274728
Kasperska, A., Matysiak, A., & Cukrowska-Torzewska, E. (2024). Managerial (dis)preferences towards employees working from home: Post-pandemic experimental evidence. PLOS ONE, 19(5), e0303307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303307
Yang, L., Holtz, D., Jaffe, S., Suri, S., Sinha, S., Weston, J., Joyce, C., Shah, N., Sherman, K., Hecht, B., & Teevan, J. (2022). The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4
work from home, hybrid work, employee satisfaction, organizational culture, career development, human capital management, service quality
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in Rode, Semantic Scholar, and open alex.
